Aquí hay una pequeña variación . Probado con r56.
THREE.Object3D._matrixAux = new THREE.Matrix4(); // global auxiliar variable
// Warnings: 1) axis is assumed to be normalized.
// 2) matrix must be updated. If not, call object.updateMatrix() first
// 3) this assumes we are not using quaternions
THREE.Object3D.prototype.rotateAroundWorldAxis = function(axis, radians) {
THREE.Object3D._matrixAux.makeRotationAxis(axis, radians);
this.matrix.multiplyMatrices(THREE.Object3D._matrixAux,this.matrix); // r56
THREE.Object3D._matrixAux.extractRotation(this.matrix);
this.rotation.setEulerFromRotationMatrix(THREE.Object3D._matrixAux, this.eulerOrder);
this.position.getPositionFromMatrix(this.matrix);
}
THREE.Object3D.prototype.rotateAroundWorldAxisX = function(radians) {
this._vector.set(1,0,0);
this.rotateAroundWorldAxis(this._vector,radians);
}
THREE.Object3D.prototype.rotateAroundWorldAxisY = function(radians) {
this._vector.set(0,1,0);
this.rotateAroundWorldAxis(this._vector,radians);
}
THREE.Object3D.prototype. rotateAroundWorldAxisZ = function(degrees){
this._vector.set(0,0,1);
this.rotateAroundWorldAxis(this._vector,degrees);
}
Las tres últimas líneas son sólo para volver a sincronizar los parametros (position,rotation)
de la matriz ... Me pregunto si hay una manera más eficiente de hacer eso ...
@RamyAlZuhouri probar estos métodos más nuevos: http://stackoverflow.com/a/17712076 – user2301179