Esta es mi primera pregunta a esta increíble comunidad.Lua: __lt configuración de metametodo no funciona como quiero
En estos días estoy escribiendo un módulo Lua para mí. Aquí es una mínima parte del código con el problema
mt = {}
bf = {}
------------
-- bf.new --
------------
function bf.new(A)
local out = A
setmetatable(out,mt)
return out
end
-----------------
-- bf.tostring --
-----------------
function bf.tostring(A)
local typeA = type(A)
local out = ""
if typeA=="number" or typeA=="boolean" then
print(tostring(A))
elseif typeA=="table" then
local col = ""
local m = #A
local typeA1 = type(A[1])
for i=1,m do
if typeA1=="table" then
n = #A[1]
for j=1,n do
out = out.." "..tostring(A[i][j])
if j==n then
out = out.."\n"
end
end
elseif (typeA1=="number" or typeA1=="boolean") then
row = row.." "..tostring(A[i][j])
end
end
end
return out
end
-----------------------------
-- bf.compare(A,logical,B) --
-----------------------------
function bf.compare(A,logical,B)
if (logical~="<" and
logical~=">" and
logical~="<=" and
logical~=">=" and
logical~="==" and
logical~="~=") then
error("second input input must be a logical operator written into a string")
end
local out = {}
local ind = {}
local count = 0
if type(B)=="number" then
if type(A[1])=="table" then
for i=1,#A do
out[i] = {}
for j=1,#A[1] do
loadstring("cond ="..A[i][j]..logical..B)()
if cond then
out[i][j] = true
count = count+1
ind[count] = (i-1)*#A[1]+j
else
out[i][j] = false
end
end
end
elseif type(A[1])=="number" then
for j=1,#A do
loadstring("cond ="..A[j]..logical..B)()
if cond then
out[j] = true
count = count+1
ind[count] = j
else
out[j] = false
end
end
end
else
if (type(A[1])=="table" and type(B[1])=="table") then
if (#A==#B and #A[1]==#B[1]) then
for i=1,#A do
out[i] = {}
for j=1,#A[1] do
loadstring("cond ="..A[i][j]..logical..B[i][j])()
if cond then
out[i][j] = true
count = count+1
ind[count] = (i-1)*#A[1]+j
else
out[i][j] = false
end
end
end
else
error("The comparison can be done between "..
"two matrix with same dimension "..
"or between a matrix with a scalar value")
end
elseif (type(A[1])=="number" and type(B[1])=="number") then
if (#A==#B) then
for j=1,#A do
loadstring("cond ="..A[j]..logical..B[j])()
if cond then
out[j] = true
count = count+1
ind[count] = j
else
out[j] = false
end
end
else
error("Comparison between "..
"two vector with different dimension")
end
else
error("The comparison can be done between "..
"two matrix with same dimension "..
"or between a matrix with a scalar value")
end
end
return setmetatable(out,mt)--,ind
end
------------------------
-- metamethod setting --
------------------------
mt.__tostring = bf.tostring
mt.__lt = function(A,B) return bf.compare(A,"<",B) end
--------------------------
-- use of my metamethod --
--------------------------
A = bf.new{{1,2,3,4},{5,6,7,8},{9,10,11,12}}
B = bf.new{{3,6,1,8},{1,3,87,20},{11,2,5,7}}
C1 = bf.compare(A,"<",B)
C2 = A<B
print("What I want")
print(C1)
print("What I get")
print(C2)
Si ejecuta este pequeño script, se puede ver que cuando se utiliza la función directamente bf.compare tengo lo que necesito. Cuando uso el bf.compare a través del meta-método, me da solo un valor "escalar" de verdadero.
¿Alguna sugerencia?
EDITAR
aquí está la salida:
What I want
true true false true
false false true true
true false false false
What I get
true
>Exit code: 0
Realmente no puedo ver eso, porque no muestra la salida. – Puppy
+1 por dar realmente código de trabajo. – jpjacobs